Event Results
MUS Spring ShowdownDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LANIER Hope | V D V V V | V V | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 2 | LIU Peilin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | MORRISON Archer | D V V V V | V D | 0.8 | 4 | +3.2 |
| 3 | BHATARA Arnav | V V D V | V V | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 5 | CHEN Isaac | V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 6 | LANDMAN Orinda | V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 7 | JOHNSON Stuart | D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 8 | YENNAGIRI Bhargav | V V D D D | V | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 9 | HWANG Jungho | D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 10 | REZE ian | V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 11 | KANG Justin | D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 12 | KANG Julian | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |