Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | ANCONA Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 39% |
2 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% |
3 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% |
3 | AMODEMO Charles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
5 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
6 | HEALY Tyler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% | |
7 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
8 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
9 | SCHKODA Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
10 | YU Dale | 100% | 95% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
11 | MAGIDSON Josh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
12 | SHEIKH Arham | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
13 | BURNS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
14 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
15 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
16 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
17 | BOVA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 58% | 26% | 6% | - |
18 | CAPUTO John | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
19 | HASSETT Thomas | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
20 | DONG Haoxiang | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
21 | ZHANG Shengqi | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
22 | XU Mathu Yang | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | ZHANG Shenghong | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.