Event Results
IFC 2026 Spring ClassicDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PRIJATEL John R. | V V V V D | V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | THOMAS Samuel | V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | NOSKO zachary | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 3 | CALL Titus | D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 5 | PETTIJOHN Luke | V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 6 | JACKSON Christopher | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |