The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Jason Liu and (2) Abdel Salem.

Event Preview

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

THE TAMPA CHALLENGE RYC/RJCCSaturday, February 5, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Wiregrass Ranch Sports Campus, 3021 Sports Coast Way · Wesley Chapel, FL
27 approved entrants 4 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2850 3040 - 2714
5 - 8 2617 2657 - 2533
9 - 16 2309 2496 - 2169
17 - 27 1756 2171 - 1280

Registrations

1 Qian, Jason Epic Fencing Club C21 3040 2782.06
2 jittan, daniel Orlando Fencing Academy C21 2922 2639.24
3 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club C21 2723 2454.02
4 Knoepffler, Alex Masters Fencing Club C20 2714 2412.03
5 Tang, Albert OnTarget Fencing Club E22 2657 2405.33
6 Sage, Michael Lotus Fencing Academy C21 2651 2379.51
7 Gorbachev, Alexander Masters Fencing Club C21 2626 2318.10
8 Klyczek, Andrew Tidewater Fencing Club C22 2533 2273.25
9 Ortega, Jose-Arnel Masters Fencing Club C21 2496 2131.84
10 De Coquet, Maximilian Lotus Fencing Academy D22 2365 2067.18
11 Alonso, Vinicius Miami Lakes Fencing Club D21 2340 2035.04
12 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy E22 2289 2027.34
13 Wang, Brayden Birmingham Fencing Club E22 2287 2009.16
14 Moorhouse, Emmett Tidewater Fencing Club E21 2309 2009.00
15 Ross, Paul Birmingham Fencing Club D21 2215 1879.55
16 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club U 2169 1857.90
17 Ivanenko, Alex Masters Fencing Club C21 2135 1803.26
18 Kandagadla, Rishi Orlando Fencing Academy D22 2078 1755.28
19 Felix, Ian Orlando Fencing Academy E22 2171 1702.97
20 Batra, Dev Orlando Fencing Academy D22 1977 1632.16
21 Lee, Ethan OnTarget Fencing Club U 1907 1601.60
22 Gokce, Ellis Lotus Fencing Academy U 1626 805.10
23 Hasbun, Christopher Masters Fencing Club U 1388 662.99
24 Guptill, Grady Williamson County Fencing Club U 1280 240.60
25 Guptill, Grady Williamson County Fencing Club U 1280 240.60
26 Brown, Luke Williamson County Fencing Club U 1739 < 0
27 Brown, Luke Williamson County Fencing Club U 1739 < 0

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.