Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BLOW Iman (Mani) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
2 | TIEU May L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
3 | MASSIALAS Sabrina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% |
3 | BINDER Sylvie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
5 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% |
6 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
7 | DEVORE Delphine P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
8 | PUSTILNIK Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
9 | DESCHNER Stefani K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
10 | AHN Gabriella | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
11 | TAN Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
12 | LEE Yejine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
13 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
14 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
15 | ZEISS Madison E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
16 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
17 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% | |
19 | FEI Ruoqiu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | 4% |
20 | MARTOS Sara A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
21 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
22 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
23 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
24 | MINARIK Natalie M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
25 | LAM Justina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
26 | LEE Annora Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
27 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
28 | CANDESCU Diana | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
29 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 6% | - |
30 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
31 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
32 | ZHANG Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
33 | HORSLEY Asherah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 20% | 1% |
34 | HAO Alicia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
35 | BIASCO Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
36 | HAO Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
37 | SABATINI Isabella Ravenne | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
38 | VIQUEIRA Samantha M. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
39 | WEINTRAUB Rei H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
39 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
41 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
42 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
43 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
44 | YANKOVSKIY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
45 | CROMPTON Celia N. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
46 | REN Olivia Y. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
47 | KASI Anisha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
48 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 24% |
49 | WANG Karina (Karina Xue Wang) X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
50 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
51 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
53 | ABAYEVA Sasha | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
54 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
55 | GONG Christina S. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
56 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
57 | CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 2% |
58 | GIANNESCHI Julia R. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | TANG Louise | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
60 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
61 | LAU Sydnee M. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
62 | LIN Annie X. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
63 | ADLER Polly Z. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
63 | THOMPSON Julia T. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
65 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
66 | HERNANDEZ Susanne | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
67 | ALFONSO Czarina M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
68 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% | |
69 | SHALANSKY Julia B. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
70 | LO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
71 | CHOI Lenna K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
72 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 8% | - |
73 | LUONG Paige K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
73 | NISHIMURA Madeleine A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
73 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
76 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
77 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
78 | SHEN Jasmine N. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
79 | NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% |
79 | BHANOT Gayatri | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | WU Catherine | 100% | 94% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
82 | CHON Samantha | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
83 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
84 | MAK Tinney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
85 | ZAROFF Roxanne | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
86 | MAROTTA Veronica L. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
87 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
88 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
89 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
90 | BARNETTE Zoe | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
91 | MANDOUR Sophia M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
92 | RASO Sofia G. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
93 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
94 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
95 | LUKINS Tianji | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
96 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
97 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
98 | HALL Velma | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
99 | NOVOSELTSEVA Elizabeth (Liza) M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
100 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
101 | MERGES Gretl C. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
102 | WALKER Mayah J. | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
103 | HUNT Tarleton Q. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
104 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
105 | CHEN Nicole Y. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
106 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
107 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
108 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
109 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
110 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
111 | BANIN Isabelle J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
111 | HE Xiangxin | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
113 | LEE Alina | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
114 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
115 | TAN Delphine | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
116 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
117 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
118 | FANG Serena | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
119 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
120 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
121 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
122 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | 100% | 79% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
123 | YU Seneca | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.