Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGH Reyaansh | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 2 | SITU Baiqin | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 3 | LEBURU Abhiram | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 3 | ZENG Cayden | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | AGARWAL Jagrav | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 2% |
| 6 | VIEN Bradley | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 7 | LIN Tiffany | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 8 | TATINENI Charvi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 9 | SINGH Shiv | 15% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 10 | CHOI William | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 33% | 2% | |
| 11 | HO Kasper | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 12 | WANG Theodore | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 13 | XIE Garrett | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | LEE Jasper | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 15 | JAIN Shubhit | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | LAI Olivia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 17 | SOUSA Lauren | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 18 | KO Alyssa | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 19 | WONG Beatrice | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | LEE Jayden | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | ZHENG Ivan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | SINGH Aditi | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LEE Thoren | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 24 | TANG Ming-Hao Audrey | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | YETCHERLA Aarya | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 26 | YANG Arthur | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 27 | KOMALA Aryan Missing ID | |||||||
| 28 | RODRIGUEZ-REINA Julian | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | NICHOLS Miranda | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | CHEN Thomas | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 31 | ROSIN Milena | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | LAU Ryan Arwin | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | SONI Avika | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | RAI Ariv | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | SHARMA Ari | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KHATRI Leila | < 1% | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
| 37 | TANG Evelyn | < 1% | 4% | 53% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | NUTALAPATI Sai | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 39 | HTET Nolan | < 1% | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | WU Harvey | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.