Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KOCAB Elizabeth (Liz) R. | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 79% |
2 | GORDET Cristina G. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 2% |
3 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | - | - | 2% | 28% | 62% | 7% |
3 | TELLES Anna | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
5 | TRICE Diane R. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
6 | GALES Henri H. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
7 | HEARNE Rosa | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
8 | MCMENAMIN Dianna S. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
9 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 28% |
10 | NANTON SHYAMALA M. | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
11 | RICH Caroline B. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
12 | RADICH Lori G. | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
13 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
14 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
15 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
16 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | HURLEY Tanya J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
18 | GROENING Joanne | - | 2% | 20% | 54% | 22% | 2% |
19 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
20 | EL-SALEH S.S. Rachel | 61% | 33% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
21 | JACKSON Wilma S. | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
22 | CHRISS Rhonda | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
23 | JENSEN MJ | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
24 | MANDEL Helen (Jenner) | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
25 | TAYLOR Francine M. | 1% | 17% | 59% | 21% | 1% | - |
26 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
27 | KELLEY Cathy A. | 20% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
28 | LOOMIS Janet H. | 7% | 36% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - |
29 | MOREY Brenda | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.