Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BABY Sada M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 3 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 3 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 5 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 5 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 7 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 8 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 9 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 10 | MERZA Celina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 11 | MICHEL Violet N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 11 | WOZNIAK Kelli | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 15 | IZENSON Lark (Keli) (Lark) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 17 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 18 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 19 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 7% |
| 21 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 22 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 24 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 27 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 29 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 30 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 31 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 32 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 34 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 35 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 36 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 40 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
| 41 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 42 | SULLIVAN Caroline E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 44 | BECCHINA Bridget F. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | CHEN Erin Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 46 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 47 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | SHEA Erin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 49 | YUN Joy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 50 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 51 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 52 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 53 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 54 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 55 | BUCHMANN Vivien | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 56 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 57 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 58 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 59 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 60 | WITEK Sophie B. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 61 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 63 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 66 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 68 | PALMER Kristen E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 69 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 70 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 93% | 59% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 73 | PINCUS Lucy Y. | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 75 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 76 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 77 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 78 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | ZHUANG Sophia | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 80 | WANG Caroline Y. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 82 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 83 | CASHMAN Natalie | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 84 | YUN Maya | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | TURNER Zoe Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 85 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 87 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 89 | SONG Jenny | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 90 | WU Zoe | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 91 | CHEN Erica | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 92 | YONG Annika A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 93 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | SHVARTSMAN Rochelle | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 95 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 96 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 97 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 98 | HILADO Sarah | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | FAHRI Monir J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 99 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 101 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 102 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | PARKER Abigale B. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 103 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 107 | MILLER Tiffany D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 108 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 109 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 110 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 112 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 113 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | IYER Mohini R. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | MACE Eliza M. | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 116 | CARNEY Gabriella | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.