USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div I-A Women's Foil

Monday, July 1, 2019 at 1:00 PM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 STAMOS Maria 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 51%
2 LAM Justina 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 43%
3 TANG Louise 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 47% 13%
3 KONG Chin-Yi 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 30% 6%
5 ABAYEVA Sasha 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 27% 4%
6 KASI Anisha 100% 100% 100% 96% 83% 51% 16%
7 BREKER Anika 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 10%
8 CHON Samantha 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
9 LEE Alina 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12%
10 SHALANSKY Julia B. 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 8%
11 TALWALKAR Apoorva 100% 91% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
12 LEVI Lea 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
13 ALFONSO Czarina M. 100% 100% 96% 82% 50% 17% 2%
14 MAROTTA Veronica L. 100% 100% 96% 81% 52% 20% 3%
15 HOOSHI Erica S. 100% 100% 98% 83% 48% 12%
16 CROMPTON Celia N. 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
17 HUNT Tarleton Q. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 19%
18 BARNETTE Zoe 100% 100% 98% 90% 66% 32% 7%
19 BIASCO Anna 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 29%
20 CASTANEDA Erika L. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
21 LOW Sharon J. 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
22 GONG Christina S. 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 6%
23 CHEN Nicole Y. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 11%
24 YANKOVSKIY Anastasia 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
25 SHEN Sophia H. 100% 100% 95% 77% 40% 9%
26 YAMAGUCHI Kate M. 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 7%
27 KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) 100% 97% 79% 43% 13% 1%
28 JING Alexandra 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 11%
29 MERGES Gretl C. 100% 99% 90% 65% 33% 9% 1%
30 MASSICK Laine 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 12%
31 CHO Gracie L. 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
32 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
33 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 100% 94% 71% 36% 11% 2% -
34 MOLHO Sofia 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
34 KOKES Gabrielle 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 5%
36 BHANOT Gayatri 100% 100% 96% 83% 54% 22% 4%
37 ZHENG Ivy 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 6%
38 HERNANDEZ Susanne 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
39 SCHATZ Kristina J. 100% 88% 56% 22% 5% -
40 KIM Lauren Hyomin 100% 93% 64% 26% 5% -
40 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa 100% 86% 49% 16% 3% -
42 KOENIG Charlotte R. 100% 98% 82% 48% 15% 2%
43 VONA Elena M. 100% 86% 52% 19% 4% -
44 CHEN Cynthia 100% 98% 89% 63% 30% 8% 1%
45 SUSINI Anna K. 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% - -
46 LEE Brianna J. 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 41% 10%
47 JONES LONGENBACH Melanie 100% 99% 91% 67% 33% 9% 1%
48 JEWETT Jamie 100% 95% 73% 39% 13% 2% -
49 LEE Paulina 100% 100% 95% 77% 45% 14% 2%
50 FERNANDES Thea 100% 90% 60% 26% 7% 1% -
51 OUTHRED Maya E. 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
52 SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. 100% 56% 16% 2% - -
53 KONG Olivia 100% 98% 82% 48% 15% 2%
54 LEWIS Amanda N. 100% 81% 43% 14% 3% - -
55 WALKER Mayah J. 100% 98% 87% 58% 25% 5% -
56 YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) 100% 98% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
57 ATLURI Srija 100% 95% 72% 37% 12% 2% -
58 HALL Velma 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 21% 4%
58 YANG Blanche 100% 87% 52% 19% 4% - -
60 PO Edith 100% 96% 76% 43% 15% 3% -
61 LI Meilin 100% 95% 75% 42% 15% 3% -
62 TAN Delphine 100% 87% 53% 21% 5% 1% -
63 SHANG Andrea 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 3% -
64 KELLY Katherine E. 100% 93% 66% 31% 8% 1% -
65 KEESING Liana 100% 96% 78% 46% 17% 3% -
66 SEAL Julie T. 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 5%
67 UYANIK Nerine 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1%
68 SLOWINSKI Maia A. 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 6%
69 HAUK Zsofia F. 100% 69% 27% 5% 1% -
70 VEERKAMP Molly 100% 92% 60% 22% 4% -
71 COKER Bettina M. 100% 82% 46% 15% 3% - -
72 LUU Shanon K. 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2% -
73 CHO Taylor S. 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 3% -
74 YEH Samantha 100% 97% 81% 49% 20% 4% -
75 BALCH Julia 100% 88% 56% 23% 5% 1% -
76 WU Renee 100% 73% 32% 8% 1% - -
77 CHON Sydney 100% 74% 32% 7% 1% -
78 NEWHARD Zelia K. 100% 94% 72% 38% 13% 2% -
79 DUAN Konnie 100% 92% 64% 30% 8% 1% -
80 TURNER Stephanie E. 100% 79% 40% 12% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.