Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 2 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% |
| 3 | HARRIS Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
| 3 | ALLEN Graham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 5 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% | |
| 6 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 7 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | DILLE Brice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% | |
| 9 | LICHTEN Keith H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 10 | RESHEIDAT Shadi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 8% |
| 11 | DIAZ HERNANDEZ Yasmany E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | 2% | |
| 12 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 13 | DYER CJ | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
| 14 | OKURA Ethan R. | 100% | 95% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 6% | < 1% | - |
| 18 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
| 18 | PAGE Aaron M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 18% | |
| 20 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 21 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 22 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | 3% | |
| 24 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | LEE PETER H. | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | HERBEL Dellas O. | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 27 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | LU Qi | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | KALAPASEV Nenad (Ned) (Ned) S. | 100% | 99% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | TOOMEY Brian L. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 98% | 79% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | KENT IV David | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | COMSTOCK III Robert L. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | STEPHEN Dennis L. | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.