Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
| 2 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 3 | DEMING Clare L. | - | - | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 3 | SIERRA Kate | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 14% |
| 5 | BERMAN Frauke | - | - | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
| 6 | JOHNSON Laura S. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% |
| 7 | DEWSNUP Kelly | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
| 8 | DREYER Nadia S. | 14% | 43% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 9 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | - | 5% | 34% | 41% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | NASH Sara | 52% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 11 | MAY Leigh | 33% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 12 | HOWARD Megan W. | 33% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.