Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | YAM Danika | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 3 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 5 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | 6% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
| 6 | HUANG Rachael | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 7 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
| 8 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% |
| 9 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 10 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 11 | HUAI Delilah | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | < 1% |
| 12 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 13 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 14 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 15 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 1% |
| 16 | JEONG Katie | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 17 | BEAUMONT-WINT Victoria H. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 18 | MANI Francesca B. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 19 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 20 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LO Chloe | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | SEAL Cameron I. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | WEI JoyAnn | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 24 | KONG Daniela | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DENG Brooke | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 27 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 57% | 12% |
| 28 | CHEN Kevy | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
| 29 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 30 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 31 | KHOST Maeve | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LOHARA Audrey | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | CHAN Jolene | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | LIU Sydney | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 35 | FENG Alicia G. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 36 | NASIROV Zemfira | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 37 | SHEARER Alena | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 39 | BERMAN greta | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 40 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 41 | GOLDIN Nina | 1% | 17% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CHO Audrey | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Elaine | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | DIECK Miranda P. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | KIM Eliza | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 47 | BLAKE Anna | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | GARRETT Madrid | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | POLSTON Ella | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 50 | TREACY Fiona | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SOEHARTONO Jessica | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 1% |
| 52 | ZENG Xinyi | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 53 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | DANIEL Gabrielle | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 55 | BUSH Divina | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BUSH Bethany | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | DEHON Inès | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 59 | SUSPITSYNA Alexandra (Sasha) | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 3% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SHUMAKIN Alisa | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 62 | FOWLER Amaia | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | LUKER Hannah | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | PILAT Izabela | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 69 | MCAFEE Jada | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 70 | BERNARD Kathryn | 11% | 43% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | MORROW Elsha | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | WANG Kallie | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | BULLARD Neha | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | STONE Coral | 16% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | BRINKMAN Samantha | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 76 | MANSPERGER Gia | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | HUANG Neila | 3% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 78 | FOSS Persephone | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | SEAL Ayda | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 81 | BHARDWAJ Jia | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 82 | FAN Alexandria | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.