Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 2 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 3 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 3 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 9% |
| 5 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 6 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 17% |
| 7 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 8 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 9 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 10 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 11 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 12 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 13 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% |
| 14 | LEACH Meka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 15 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 16 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 18 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 19 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 20 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 21 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 3% |
| 22 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 23 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 24 | MIN MAGNOLIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | 5% |
| 25 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
| 27 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
| 28 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 9% |
| 29 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 32 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 33 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | GREGORY Aleksandra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 36 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 2% |
| 37 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 38 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 39 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 40 | BOHRER Shira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 41 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 42 | SUN Ruilin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 69% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
| 44 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 45 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | BARCLAY Khyri | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 47 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 49 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 50 | LO Sabrina S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 100% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 54 | ODOM Megan A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% | 1% |
| 56 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LEE Scarlett | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 58 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 59 | LABRACHE Ella P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 60 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 63 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 99% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | HOOPER Lucy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 65 | YU Bailey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 66 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 67 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 68 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 69 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 70 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 71 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 74 | QURESHI Nisa | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 75 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 77 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 78 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 79 | QIU Emily | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 80 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | DUAN Annie S. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 83 | FARICY Aislynn A. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 84 | YERIAN Ayda | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 85 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 86 | QUIN Kathleen J. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 87 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 88 | PERVEZ Zaynab | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 89 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 90 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 90 | WONG Bella | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 92 | MARTINO Alessandra | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 93 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 94 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 96 | CASPAR Margot | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 97 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | BROWN Hannah | 100% | 94% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 98 | ZALEWSKI Rosalyn | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | XIA Amy | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 101 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 102 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 103 | GUPTA Sanya | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 104 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 104 | DAVIS Cate | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 106 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 107 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 107 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 109 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 110 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 111 | YEH Megan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 112 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 114 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 115 | GEVA Eliana | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | TAVAREZ Kayla | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 118 | JARONIK Izzie | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 119 | SOIN Kaira | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.