Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEACH Meka A. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
2 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% |
3 | ZHU Serene M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
3 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
5 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
6 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
7 | TANG Sze Nga Nicole | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
8 | QIU Emily | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
9 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% |
10 | HAN Hannah Y. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
11 | PATIL Amulya | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
12 | QIAN Irene | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
13 | BUSH emma | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 22% |
14 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
15 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
16 | TAYLOR Kylin | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
17 | SYKES Elynor | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 48% | 9% |
18 | YAO Melinda | - | - | 6% | 29% | 53% | 12% | |
19 | LEE Scarlett | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 14% |
20 | STERR Isabella M. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 19% | 2% |
21 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
22 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
23 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
24 | LEE Olivia | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
25 | LUO Amy | - | - | 7% | 30% | 44% | 18% | |
26 | YUMIACO Nylah | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
27 | TOLSMA Chloe | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
28 | NEMETH Katherine | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | AGAON Evelyn | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 1% |
30 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 1% | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
31 | CAFASSO Natalya | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% | - | |
32 | VAN VACTER Madelynn | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% |
33 | IVY Zhao | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
34 | YERIAN Ayda | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
35 | PATELLI Anna Alice | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
36 | BECKMAN Ana | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
37 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
38 | CARRIER Meredith | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
39 | MIRZA Annoshae | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
40 | CUEVA Viola | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
41 | LEE REGINA | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% | |
42 | NGUYEN Ella | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
43 | KUMAR Eva | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | SOIN Kaira | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
45 | XIA Amy | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
46 | SPRINGER Sierra | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
47 | SHIV Avni | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 14% |
47 | WU Chloe | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
49 | WONG Caitlin | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
50 | LIU Charlotte | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
51 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
52 | LEE Claire | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | LINCOLN Clare | 17% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
54 | PULLEN Ayah | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
55 | KINDEL Amara | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
56 | LEE Camilla | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
57 | PROFIS Liora | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
58 | ANDERSON Melody | 17% | 40% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
58 | MISHIMA Audrey | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | BUSH kinsey | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | JONES Charlotte | 5% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
61 | HAYNES Antonia | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
63 | ILYAS Ayah | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
64 | TOSH Audrey | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
65 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
66 | NIITANI Lucille | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
67 | NIX Reagan | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
68 | PAN Angela | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
69 | CAO Carolyn | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
70 | PARK Chloe | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
71 | PAPAZIAN Jacqueline | 15% | 48% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
72 | SATNIC Lauren | 21% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
73 | DIECK Kaylee | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
74 | BLANCO Ariia | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
75 | JONES Veronica C. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.