Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 2 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 3 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 3 | KOROL Neta | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 5 | SHIH Diane | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 6 | KIM Katherine | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 7 | KOROL Dana | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 8 | KOSLOW Amicie | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 10 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 45% | 9% |
| 11 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | LEE Ji Ahn | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | ||
| 13 | CUI Melody J. | - | 6% | 36% | 44% | 14% | ||
| 14 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 15 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 21% | ||
| 16 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 18 | HO Rachel E. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 19 | PENG Amber L. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 20 | RANDOLPH Piper | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 21 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 22 | CHEN Chloe I. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | GORDOA SOFIA | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 27 | CABALU Alaina | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | ||
| 28 | UMAP Arna | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | RAO Sonia D. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | OTEYZA Camille | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | CHOI Kailyn | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | HSIUNG Samantha | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | HOBSON Ava | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | SUN Emily | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | PATEL Ishwari | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | HOU Tina | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | GAMRADT Taylor | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | SALAZAR Therese | 12% | 43% | 38% | 7% | - | ||
| 42 | LEE Brielle | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | ESTRADA alondra maria | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Zoe | 30% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | BURRUEL SAGREDO Nataly Alexandra | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.