Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 2 | LEE Lauren | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 3 | YANG Lea | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 5 | YAM Danika | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
| 6 | LO Chloe | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Siena | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
| 8 | FENG Alicia G. | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | WANG Zidan | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | CHAN Jolene | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 11 | HU Michelle | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | ZHAO Abigail | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 13 | KIM Eliza | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 14 | DIECK Miranda P. | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 15 | DAUB Lauren | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 16 | SHEARER Alena | 6% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | CHEN Elaine | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | DANIELSON Stella | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 19 | SOEHARTONO Jessica | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | TREACY Fiona | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 21 | SUN Yifiei (Nancy) | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 22 | WANG Jingming | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 23 | WANG Peijia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 24 | POIRIER Hailey | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 25 | LIU Emily | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SUN Yitong (Emily) | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.