Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
2 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
3 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
3 | LEE Allison | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
5 | HOBSON Ava | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 1% |
6 | PEREZ Mariezel | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
7 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
7 | DO Leila | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
10 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
11 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
12 | HSU Kaylin | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
13 | GUO Lily | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
14 | SUN Emily | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
15 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
16 | ARLOTTO Lucia | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | KIM Rachel | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
18 | ZHENG Zoe | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
19 | DESAI Esha | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
20 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
21 | HOU Annie | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
22 | BUGA Sophie | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
23 | MORALES Paulina | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
24 | YOON Kirstin | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | AN December | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
26 | CHOI Kailyn | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | MENG Annabel | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
28 | ZHONG Aleena | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.