Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
2 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
3 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | - | 7% | 34% | 48% | 10% |
3 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 45% | 15% |
5 | OH Jaden | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
6 | LAKE Wyatt J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
7 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 47% |
8 | CHOU Jared T. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
9 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
10 | AIBEL Hudson J. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
11 | GOBBO Alexander | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
12 | NORIEGA Julian | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | - |
13 | WANG Logan | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - |
14 | LI Peihong | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 10% |
15 | WONG Matthew H. | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
16 | JI Evan | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
17 | LE Jacob W. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 3% |
18 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
19 | NGUYEN Liam | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
20 | WONG Antonio | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
21 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | TAN Peter | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
23 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
24 | KIM Aiden | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
25 | PONG Caleb J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
26 | KEITH HUDSON | 16% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
27 | LLIDO Soren | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
28 | AGEYEV Aleksey | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
29 | VIANNA Guilherme | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | BAUER Roman | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
31 | FRCEK Armand A. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | ADAMS Jackson | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | SHPOLYANSKY Jax F. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
34 | CORN Naael S. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | WANG Rui Qin | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
36 | QIU Tengjie | 8% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
37 | NG Micah | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
38 | HAHN Jacob | 16% | 39% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
39 | ULLOA Trent J. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
40 | SIDDIQI Amman | 39% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
41 | SIPKINS Theodore | 6% | 35% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
42 | LEE Benjamin | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.