Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 2 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | SHI Cathleen | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 5 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 3% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 4% |
| 7 | LEE Sophia | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 2% | |
| 8 | YUAN Greta | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 10 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 11 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 12 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 13 | WEI Vivian W. | 2% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 14 | HENRY Soraya S. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | REN Xinling | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | MIKA Veronica | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 19 | KIM Sydney | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | LANDAU Julia B. | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 21 | YUN Emma | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | JOHNSON Lydia | 4% | 34% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | XU Emily T. | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | SCOTT Eve | 46% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 19% | 44% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.