Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 2 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 3 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 3 | LAI Evelyn | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | HWANG Jungmin | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 6 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 7 | GAMRADT Taylor | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | RAO Sonia D. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 10 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 11 | OTEYZA Camille | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 12 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 13 | SWEENEY Helena | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 14 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | GUPTA Dea | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LEE Brielle | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | PEREZ Mariezel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 19 | LEE Allison | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | HU Kate | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 21 | BENNETT Vienne | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 22 | XU Audrey J. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHOI Kailyn | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 24 | DO Leila | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SUN Emily | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | BUGA SOPHIE | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.