Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
2 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
3 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
3 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
5 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
6 | MORALES LEDEZMA Georgina Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
7 | KIM Katherine | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
8 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 7% |
9 | OH Erin H. | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
10 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% |
11 | VIANNA Gabriella | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
12 | KANG Jiyoon | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
13 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
15 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 3% |
16 | SHUM Elizabeth | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
18 | SAAVEDRA ana | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
19 | LOCKE Savannah | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | |
20 | HWANG Jungmin | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
21 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
22 | NAM Cassie | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
24 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
25 | RAO Sonia D. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
26 | LAI Evelyn | 40% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
27 | GOLDSMITH Jenna | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | PRUITT-KENNETT Helen | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | ELSHAHAWI Janna | 17% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.