East Point, GA - East Point, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
2 | IGOE Nirali B. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
3 | FENG Kelly L. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | CHENG Ava | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
5 | WILLIAMS Audrey L. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
6 | PENSULA Sophia E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
7 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% | |
8 | BARBER Annalise | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
9 | BANKS Lauren M. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
10 | GILBRETH Meghan G. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
11 | PEREZ Gabriella (Gabi) S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
12 | THORNTON Paula R. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
13 | BEHENSKY Brenna | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
14 | SAUL Nicole | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
15 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
16 | LEE Calla | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | HUANG Hannah T. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
18 | GELBER Sara | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | PRICE Makalyn W. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
20 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
21 | DILLARD Katlyn M. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | KERAMANE Halah Z. | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
22 | GIJO Simline | 11% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
24 | BRUSH Sydney | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | HERNDON Ana | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
26 | YU Sheerea | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.