Mohegan Sun Expo Center, CT - Guilford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 2 | SCHULTES Evans | 15% | 47% | 38% | |||
| 3 | SIEGEL Elliot | - | 10% | 35% | 42% | 13% | |
| 4 | LIAO Alex J. | - | 7% | 31% | 45% | 18% | |
| 5 | BATRAK Alexander | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 6 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
| 6 | HILMER Michael | 9% | 36% | 41% | 14% | ||
| 8 | BRINTON III Robert H. | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | ||
| 9 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 18% | 58% | 24% | |||
| 10 | BREIER Matthew F. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 11 | WALIA Ishan | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | ||
| 12 | HEMINGWAY Liam | 11% | 39% | 39% | 11% | ||
| 13 | MAZUR Jacob | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | |
| 14 | GIROUX Andrew T. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 15 | INCHOCO William | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | WEI William | 23% | 49% | 25% | 3% | ||
| 17 | LY Alex | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | ||
| 18 | ZAYAS Jeancarlos | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 19 | MILLER Andrew | 16% | 46% | 32% | 6% | ||
| 20 | BRAUN Xavier G. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 20 | COSTA Nicholas J. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 22 | LI Kevin | 5% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 2% | |
| 23 | REDWOOD Peter | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | LU Kenny T. | 21% | 45% | 29% | 5% | ||
| 25 | ROTHCHILD Matthew | 42% | 46% | 11% | |||
| 25 | BRAND Sebastien | 9% | 43% | 41% | 7% | ||
| 27 | QUINE Scott Missing ID | ||||||
| 28 | MCNAMARA Mark | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | REILLY Brandon | 41% | 51% | 7% | - | ||
| 30 | BUTLER Nathan Missing ID | ||||||
| 30 | PATEL Nealkanth R. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | RIVERA Eaven Missing ID | ||||||
| 33 | BYRNE Finnegan | 1% | 15% | 49% | 35% | ||
| 34 | SISTI Joe Missing ID | ||||||
| 35 | MCKINNEY Brandon | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | DEVAUX Ryan T. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | READING Sean Missing ID | ||||||
| 38 | NEWTON Luke | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | PRIGNANO Dominic Missing ID | ||||||
| 40 | TRAVERSO Ben | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | HEALY Kevin | 8% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 42 | MARIANO Rodrigo Missing ID | ||||||
| 43 | SILVA Wesley Missing ID | ||||||
| 44 | SMITH Ryan J. | 4% | 43% | 46% | 7% | ||
| 45 | MALDONADO Jr. Carlos A. | 14% | 47% | 39% | |||
| 46 | RIVERA Gabe Missing ID | ||||||
| 47 | STOTTLMEYER Michael Missing ID | ||||||
| 47 | SABETTA Ethan | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 47 | GRESH Samuel | 31% | 50% | 19% | |||
| 50 | VAUDREY Riley Missing ID | ||||||
| 50 | TEMPLETON Patrick | 3% | 28% | 43% | 23% | 4% | |
| 52 | MASON Seth | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 53 | DESJARDINS Aidan B. | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 54 | DECKER Charlie Missing ID | ||||||
| 55 | TERRY Joshua | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 56 | BOGART Jesse | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | MORELLO Lucas Missing ID | ||||||
| 58 | LEITZINGER Timothy Missing ID | ||||||
| 59 | LIEFELD Joshua Missing ID | ||||||
| 60 | SISON Ryan | 12% | 41% | 38% | 10% | ||
| 61 | ADAMS-HULL Caleb P. | 3% | 30% | 44% | 21% | 3% | |
| 62 | SPEARING Samuel | 13% | 39% | 37% | 11% | ||
| 63 | KIM Elliot H. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 64 | HERRERA Christian Missing ID | ||||||
| 65 | MOORE Eric | 20% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 66 | RENDERO Dominic | 30% | 50% | 20% | |||
| 67 | LICKI David R. | 19% | 48% | 30% | 4% | ||
| 68 | BAKER Thomas Missing ID | ||||||
| 69 | JNO CHARLES Zorth Missing ID | ||||||
| 70 | JEWETT Jason Missing ID | ||||||
| 71 | MENENDEZ Angel Missing ID | ||||||
| 72 | OTFINOSKI Jason Missing ID | ||||||
| 73 | WHITAKER Devin | 25% | 46% | 25% | 4% | ||
| 74 | HOUSTON Miles Missing ID | ||||||
| 75 | LAFRANCE John | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.