Hangover Open @ DFC

Senior Mixed Épée

Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 11:00 AM

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BLYTH Jourdain L. 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 8%
2 REES Daniel I. 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
3 TAFOYA Devin D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 24%
3 MCGINNIS Aidan K. 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 8%
5 MILLER Jeffrey E. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
6 SHUGART Henry R. 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 17%
7 ALAIMO Charles 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 32% 5%
8 NIEBERGALL Colin G. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 11%
9 ALTMAN Jeff H. 100% 99% 86% 48% 14% 2%
10 TOTEMEIER Ann M. 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 7%
11 POCHON Adam V. 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 12%
12 VASHRO Layne 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 34%
13 JORAM Jacob P. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 10%
14 CLAYMAN John A. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
15 LANDWEHR Helen B. 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% -
16 KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) 100% 92% 63% 25% 5% -
17 CHAN Andrew M. 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
18 TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. 100% 98% 84% 51% 16% 1%
19 HOLDERNESS Landon 100% 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% -
20 SAUTHOFF Chris 100% 92% 36% 5% - -
21 HUTCHINSON Valerie A. 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 3%
22 GUERRERO Gonzalo 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 16% 1%
23 MUFIC Oliver 100% 95% 67% 23% 3% - -
24 MILLER Veronica 100% 88% 53% 17% 3% -
25 COLE Matthew 100% 100% 97% 81% 39% 6%
26 JOHANSON David B. 100% 95% 71% 35% 9% 1%
27 EBELL Ivan D. 100% 93% 45% 8% - - -
28 FORMAN Logan 100% 100% 87% 54% 19% 3% -
29 WEBER Dick 100% 10% - - - - -
30 GORTON George F. 100% 87% 51% 17% 2% -
31 NIETZER Jo A. 100% 49% 12% 2% - -
32 MESCHIA Maggie 100% 69% 29% 7% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.