San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 39% |
2 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 25% |
3 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
3 | LAU Chloe M. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
5 | IBEN Claire L. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
6 | OH Erin H. | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 19% | 2% |
7 | KOROL Dana | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
8 | YU Seneca | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
9 | KOROL Neta | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
10 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
11 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
12 | KIM Alyssa | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
13 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
14 | LIN Joyce | 25% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
15 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
16 | WANG Catherine K. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | CUI Melody J. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
18 | HOBSON Leena | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
19 | YIN Helen | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
20 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
21 | PENG Amber L. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
22 | FUNG Carina W. | 32% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
23 | LI Angela | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.