San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% |
2 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
3 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
3 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
5 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | 3% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
6 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
7 | GERARDIN Marie | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
8 | SHAY Mia | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
9 | JIANG Corina | - | 5% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
10 | LIU Jennifer L. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
11 | ZHANG Chuyi | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
12 | DU Angela | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
13 | DING Sandra | 7% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
14 | VACCA Erica | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
15 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
16 | SHAMSI Lila | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | SOIN Anika A. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
18 | SINHA Zara | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
19 | UPPALAPATI Sriya | - | 2% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
20 | SLACKMAN Valerie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 38% | 5% |
21 | BONDAR Nika | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
22 | WILLIAMS Sarah | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
23 | CHEN Bella | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
24 | STRATTON Alexia | 11% | 60% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
25 | HABERMAN Hailey | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
26 | DHILLON Ria | 34% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.