Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
2 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
3 | GUTKOVSKAYA Nora | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
3 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
5 | JACKSON Wilma S. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
6 | HUEY Sharone A. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
7 | OFFERLE Judith (Jude) A. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
8 | MARX Suzanne Brown | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
9 | LOVE Georgina | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
10 | HERMES Kathleen A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
11 | ALZONA Esperanza P. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
12 | BALOT Agota | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
13 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
14 | WHITT Lynnette A. | 6% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
15 | EL-SALEH S.S. Rachel | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
16 | HURLEY Tanya J. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
17 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 2% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
18 | BERARDI Gladys B. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
19 | MCBRYAN Pamela A. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
20 | BRASTED Karen (Maggie) E. | 22% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.