Event Results
Austin RYC & RJCCDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Gene | V D V V V | V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 2 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 3 | DECKER Hunter | V V D V D | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 3 | LIU Austin | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 5 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | KIM Leejay | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 7 | VAN RIET Stefan | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 8 | DADE MAXIMUS | D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 9 | CHEN Linus | V V V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 10 | WU James | V D V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 11 | TOY Tanner | V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 12 | WILKENS Benedict | V D D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 13 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 14 | SHEN Alaric | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 15 | SMADES Charlie | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 16 | ULRICH Jacob | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 17 | DONG Yueya | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |