Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STEVENS Joanne B. | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 2 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 3 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 1% | 7% | 20% | 31% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | REICHMAN Marsha E. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 5 | RECKLING Diane | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 6 | LUTTON Patricia | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 7 | CHANNING Gemin | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
| 8 | GRAHAM Bettie J. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | NOWELL Linda | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 10 | HURST Susan E. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 11 | HANAMOTO Claire M. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 12 | TURZILLO Mary A. | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | BOESCH Kit | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.