Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BECKER William L. | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 2 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 19% | |
| 3 | KOPYLOV Dmitri | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 3 | MIRONOVAS Mikhail (Misha) | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 5 | MATT Chris | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% | |
| 6 | KIZIK Val | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 7 | NEVEROVICH Vitaly V. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 8 | LILLARD Samuel N. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 9 | THORNTON Ronald J. | - | - | 7% | 35% | 52% | 6% | |
| 10 | BACON Michael F. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | MONTORIO Louis V. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 12 | HERRERA Richard K. | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 4% | |
| 13 | HECK Steven D. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 14 | MIGHELL Jason | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 15 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | KRASNICH Mike | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | PENTON Robert | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 18 | KEEFER Philip E. | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
| 19 | DASHNAW Stephen | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | ZIPPER Michael E. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 22 | CAROTHERS Michael B. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | NEMAZIE David A. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 24 | BOYLAN John R. | 17% | 42% | 33% | 8% | - | - | |
| 25 | FAINGOLD Vladimir | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | HUANG Erich | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | GLASSER Jerome | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | ZINNI Gene | 24% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | POND III George E. | 24% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | YOWELL Kevin G. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.