Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | RUNYAN Joshua | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% |
2 | SEUSS C. David | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
3 | ANTHONY Jr Donald K. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
3 | GUEBLE Jeffrey R. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
5 | KASTOR Jacaeber | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
6 | HICHA Paul R. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
7 | BADGER Carlton (Carl) M. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
8 | DAHL Chris | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
9 | YUNG Wang Y. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 44% | 17% |
10 | JAKUBEK Zygmunt J. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
11 | MALNATI Donald H. | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
12 | LARA Alfred | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
13 | WILDMAN Steve | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
14 | LEAR Donald W. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
15 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
16 | MYERS Brent M. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
17 | LAUZON Thomas (Tom) A. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 1% |
18 | PARAGANO Vincent | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
19 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
20 | FLEMING J Daniel (Dan) | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
21 | STREB Joseph S. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 51% | 12% |
22 | TRESTMAN Robert (Bob) L. | 15% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | MCLAUGHLIN Joseph R. | 17% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
24 | BAKER Keith L. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
25 | SRERE Mark A. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
26 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
27 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
28 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | SHORT Skip | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.