St. Louis, MO - St. Louis, MO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 2 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | DENNER Maximilian P. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | DIACOS Jordan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 5 | RESHEIDAT Malik | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | POPE Nico | V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | BERRIO Carter E. | V D V D V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 8 | CHEONG Heonjae | V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 10 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 11 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | ZHOU Brian | D D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | HOUTZ Jackson | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 15 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | D D V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | DU Gavin J. | V V D D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 17 | RIGHTLER Samuel | V D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 18 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | V V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | XUE Alexander | D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | LU Caleb Q. | D V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | LEE Justin | D V D D V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 24 | LACAVICH Aiden | V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | V D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | AKS Ari | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 28 | CHAN Aidan | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | ZHOU James Y. | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | KOCHENSPARGER III Robert L. | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 31 | ZHU Charlie | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 32 | HAN Edward | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | HARRINGTON Tristan L. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 33 | PARADIS Emmit | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.