Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 2 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 53% | |
| 3 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% |
| 3 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 28% |
| 5 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 6% |
| 6 | HUTH Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | |
| 7 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | 2% |
| 8 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% |
| 9 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 14% | |
| 10 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 31% | |
| 13 | YANG Alan H. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 90% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | QUINTERO Julian | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 16 | VEDRE-KYANAM KABIR BAIG Aaradhya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | PANTIN Ethan M. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 18 | ZHAN Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
| 19 | HUANG Justin | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 20 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 23 | HITT Aiden | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | GIRKIN Silas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | YOON junhyeok | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | HIGGIN Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DICKSON Evan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HOFFMAN Nick | 100% | 96% | 56% | 13% | - | - | |
| 32 | ELKIN David | 100% | 95% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GATZA Jason | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.