Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | FENG Kelly L. | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
| 2 | SAUL Nicole | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 3 | CHENG Ava | - | - | 3% | 31% | 66% | |
| 3 | GOEDICKE Elway | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 5 | BENATER Lauren | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
| 6 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 1% | 18% | 61% | 20% | |
| 7 | WILLIAMS Sophia | 1% | 9% | 36% | 44% | 10% | |
| 8 | WILLIAMS Audrey L. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 19% |
| 9 | HU Chelsea | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | BRUSH Sydney | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 11 | MOON Seojung | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 3% | 24% | 46% | 24% | 3% | |
| 13 | BROWN Hannah | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | WONG Bella | 18% | 47% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | PRICE Makalyn W. | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 28% | 49% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 5% | 32% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | PEREZ Ariana | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 19 | YU Sheerea | 41% | 48% | 10% | - | - | |
| 20 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 21 | TORRES Daisy | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.