Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 28% |
| 2 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
| 3 | NORTH Zoe M. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 3 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
| 5 | VAUGHAN Norah | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 6 | NOVIKOV Allegra | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 7 | HONG Elizabeth R. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 2% |
| 8 | QIAN Zhiyan | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | KETT-EUBANKS Tegan | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | NOVIKOV Sienna | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 11 | DATLA Meha | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 12 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 13 | ZHANG Ania | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 14 | YIM Rachael | 5% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | SYKES Lauren | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 16 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | EVELAND Zoe | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | GUHA Maya | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | EGOAVIL Isabella | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | PRAVIN Preteka | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 21 | MOSTAJIR Nika | 4% | 34% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.