Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FENG Kelly L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 2 | WILLIAMS Sophia | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 3 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 3 | LEE Calla | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Audrey L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 9% |
| 6 | CHENG Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 7 | JIANG Hannah S. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 8 | SAUL Nicole | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 32% | 13% |
| 9 | HU Chelsea | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | GOEDICKE Elway | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | BANKS Lauren M. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | MOON Seojung | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 13 | BRUSH Sydney | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | YU Sheerea | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 15 | ENDERLE Alexis N. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | DILLARD KATLYN M. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 18 | PEREZ Ariana | 4% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | TORRES Daisy | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 20 | PRICE Makalyn W. | 20% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | CHAMP-O'CONNELL Carter | 7% | 37% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.