Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 2 | HAMBARZUMIAN Heik | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
| 3 | PEGUES William C. | 1% | 12% | 37% | 41% | 10% | |
| 3 | SESSIONS Adrian | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 5 | CALDERON Peter J. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 15% | |
| 6 | CARVEY Davis W. | 2% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 5% | |
| 7 | KING Ronald F. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 8 | WEISZ Gaby | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | CAMPANA, SR. Rinaldo A. | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% | |
| 10 | MATTHEWS John (Doc) C. | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 11 | SUSSMAN Steven W. | 1% | 12% | 38% | 40% | 9% | |
| 12 | REA John P. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 13 | TYSON Julian F. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 15 | DAVIS Rick | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 16 | DESEVILLA-PIERCE Eduardo X. | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | BRYKCZYNSKI (BRICKER) James V. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | VANCE Dan | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 20 | SEXTON III Ray L. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | CARROLL John L. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.