Charlotte, NC - Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
2 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 37% |
3 | IZENSON Lark (Keli) (Lark) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
3 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
5 | JOHNSON Honor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
6 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | |
7 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
8 | PALMER Kristen E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
9 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
10 | WOZNIAK Kelli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
11 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
12 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
13 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | |
14 | JENKINS Morgan J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
15 | BROWNE Alexis G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
16 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
17 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
18 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
19 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
20 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 1% |
21 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
22 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
23 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
24 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 8% | |
24 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
26 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
27 | TURNER Zoe Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
29 | GORMAN Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
30 | ZHUANG Sophia | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | HILADO Sarah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
32 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
33 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
34 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
35 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
36 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
36 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
38 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
39 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
40 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
41 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% | |
42 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
43 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
44 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
45 | WITEK Sophie B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
46 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
47 | WONG Kristen E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
48 | MOSS Zara J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
49 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
50 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
51 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% |
52 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 22% |
53 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
54 | WARD Reghan E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
55 | SWALLOW Abigail R. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
56 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
57 | CHEN Erica | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
58 | HUNG Sarah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
59 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
60 | CHAN Leanne | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
61 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | |
62 | CASHMAN Natalie | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
63 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
64 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
65 | WHITE Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
66 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
67 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
68 | BENTOLILA Esther | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
69 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 99% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
70 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
71 | SONG Jenny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
72 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
73 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
74 | ZHOU Rebecca M. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | - |
75 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
76 | HAQ Iman | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
76 | JEN Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
78 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
79 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
80 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
81 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
82 | BARNES Kiera | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
83 | PINCUS Emma Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
84 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
85 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
86 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
87 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
87 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
89 | SWEETRA Elizabeth A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
90 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
91 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
92 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
93 | BECCHINA Bridget F. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
94 | DODRILL Brooke | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
95 | SONG Robyn | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - | |
96 | HUA Jacqueline (Jackie) J. | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
97 | SOMFELEAN Clara M. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
98 | GULATI Ria | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
99 | SEHIC Cassandra | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
100 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
101 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
102 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
103 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
104 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
105 | BAE EMMELINE | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
106 | CANSECO Laura K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
107 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
107 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
109 | TAYLOR Cecilia J. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
110 | WANG Caroline Y. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
111 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
112 | SHEA Erin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
112 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
114 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
115 | HAN Jeanette X. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
116 | FAHRI Monir J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
117 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
118 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
119 | PINCUS Lucy Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
120 | BECKER Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
121 | MIN Isabella K. | 100% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
122 | WEE Nicole | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
123 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
124 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
125 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
126 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
127 | CREUSOT Julia D. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
127 | MENKE Kavya I. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
129 | BURCH Makana Y. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
130 | SCHUTZ Katherine G. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
131 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
132 | WALTER Zsofia R. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - |
132 | WILSON Isley N. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
132 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
135 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
135 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 7% |
137 | ZHANG Judy | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
138 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
139 | LIU Lily | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
140 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
141 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
142 | WU Zoe | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
143 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | |
144 | GOMERMAN Ashley | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
145 | BOURGEOIS audreane | 100% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
146 | WU JiaQi | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
147 | CHEN Chloe Y. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
148 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
149 | LU Yi Lin | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
150 | KIM Emily | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
150 | WHELAN Brynn M. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
150 | RHIE Lena | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
153 | ZHU Cherlin | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
154 | KOWALSKI Celina | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
155 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.