Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JOHNSON Laura S. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 2 | DEMING Clare L. | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | SIERRA Kate | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | OBLONSKY Natalia | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 5 | TURNER Delia M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | VANCE Beth S. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | V D V V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 8 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | V D V D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | ENOCHS Liz | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 9 | BERMAN Frauke | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | WILSON Dawn J. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | DUNN Linda J. J. | V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | ALTMAN Leigh | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | MARENTES Blanca E. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | KING Robin E. | D D D D V D | V V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 17 | GRAJALES Emily K. | V V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
| 18 | KIM Nam Heui | D V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | V D V V D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | V V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | DEROSE Miyako N. | D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | LAPP Laurie E. | V V V D D D | D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 23 | WALTER Joanne | D D D V V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | FOLEY Eileen | D D D V V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | WILKERSON Mary B. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 26 | GLUCK Myriam | V D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | D D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | FELDMAN Jill A. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | DEGEN Anita L. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | LUM Karen | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 32 | WEBB Maud | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 33 | DIEGEL Angela E. | D D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | DAHL Naomi V. | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | JOHNSON Pamela | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 36 | TAYLOR BLAKEMORE Kim | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 37 | GORDON Sharon | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | SCHLIENGER Katia | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 39 | DEANE Dede | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 40 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 41 | HURST Susan E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.