January NAC

Div I Women's Foil

Monday, January 7, 2019 at 10:00 AM

Charlotte, NC - Charlotte, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SCRUGGS Lauren S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 69%
2 BINDER Sylvie A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 76%
3 TIEU May L. 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 20%
3 WEINTRAUB Maia M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44%
5 DESCHNER Stefani K. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 31%
6 LU Margaret L.C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 42%
7 ZHOU Emme 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 16%
8 CHO Sabrina N. 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 5%
9 MASSIALAS Sabrina C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 51%
10 BOLDOR Maria 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
11 GUO Jessica Zi Jia 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 59%
12 TAN Helen 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 15%
13 NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. 100% 99% 91% 64% 27% 4%
14 YAROSHENKO Karina 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 7%
15 PARTRIDGE Morgan K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 41%
16 CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 34% 4%
17 PUSTILNIK Nicole 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 72%
18 STAMOS Maria 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
19 ZHANG Rachel 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 10%
20 ZEISS Madison E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 51%
21 BLOW Iman (Mani) A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 33%
21 DEVORE Delphine P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73%
23 KLEINER Elyssa R. 100% 100% 100% 90% 59% 22% 3%
23 HORSLEY Asherah 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 7%
25 MARTOS Sara A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 22%
26 MOINDROT-ZILLIOX NAOMI 100% 100% 94% 74% 40% 12% 1%
27 HAO Alicia 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 20%
28 CRUM Quinn T. 100% 98% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
29 CHEN Alyssa J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 12%
30 CAO Ying 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 21% 3%
31 LAU Sydnee M. 100% 97% 74% 31% 6% 1% -
32 HUNT Tarleton Q. 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 6% -
33 RHODES Zander 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 32%
34 DU Katie J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 7%
35 LAM Justina 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 34%
36 LAFFEY Jessie S. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 22%
37 LEE Yejine 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 22% 2%
38 LOVELACE Kennedy C. 100% 100% 97% 78% 43% 13% 2%
39 MARINELLI Ever 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 49%
40 FERRARI Christina M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
41 CHENG Evelyn 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
42 MANDOUR Sophia M. 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% -
43 LEE Annora Y. 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 7%
44 TAN Elisha 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 48% 9%
45 ADLER Polly Z. 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 8% 1%
46 APELIAN Katherine 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 12% 1%
47 KIM Rachael 100% 100% 99% 85% 51% 17% 2%
48 MAK Tinney 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 52% 8%
49 CROMPTON Celia N. 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 2% -
50 FILBY Sarah M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 69% 18%
50 ZHENG Vivian 100% 99% 94% 76% 46% 17% 3%
52 LI Karina J. 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 11% 1%
53 YANKOVSKIY Anastasia 100% 100% 100% 94% 65% 21% 2%
54 VIQUEIRA Samantha M. 100% 98% 85% 56% 25% 6% 1%
55 CAULFIELD Jane H. 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 22% 2%
56 LEE Alina 100% 99% 91% 65% 30% 7% -
57 LIU Cynthia 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 3% -
58 LIN Annie X. 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
59 LEE Morgan A. 100% 100% 94% 74% 39% 9%
60 VIQUEIRA Marissa S. 100% 97% 81% 44% 12% 2% -
61 PETROVA Kristina 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
62 KNIGHT Skylar 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 6%
63 SERBAN Samantha M. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 12% 1%
64 HAO Grace 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 24% 2%
65 NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 28%
65 LAMPSON-STIXRUD Dolly C. 100% 90% 56% 20% 4% - -
67 LI Grace Q. 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3%
68 HE Elizabeth W. 100% 100% 98% 79% 34% 5% -
69 ZHOU Anna 100% 98% 84% 53% 21% 5% -
70 DU Melissa H. 100% 98% 84% 53% 21% 4% -
71 RASO Sofia G. 100% 97% 77% 38% 9% 1% -
72 KOO Haley B. 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 6%
73 BANBURY Justine 100% 99% 87% 55% 19% 2%
73 ANDREYENKA Hanna 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
75 LUONG Paige K. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 14%
76 PARK Rowan M. 100% 99% 91% 70% 38% 13% 2%
77 THOMPSON Julia T. 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 29% 5%
78 QIAN Crystal 100% 100% 95% 75% 40% 12% 1%
79 CHEN Nicole Y. 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 2% -
79 LEE Brianna J. 100% 98% 85% 51% 18% 3% -
81 SHEN Sophia H. 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1% -
82 MAROTTA Veronica L. 100% 99% 89% 63% 30% 8% 1%
83 PRILUTSKY Sarah A. 100% 100% 97% 82% 52% 18% 2%
84 ZAROFF Roxanne 100% 98% 88% 59% 25% 5% -
85 WANG Karina (Karina Xue Wang) X. 100% 100% 96% 76% 39% 10% 1%
86 FREEDMAN Miranda W. 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4% -
87 NOVOSELTSEVA Elizabeth (Liza) M. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 13% 2%
87 HALL Velma 100% 97% 79% 45% 16% 3% -
89 SUPERVILLE Zoe A. 100% 69% 27% 6% 1% - -
90 KASI Anisha 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 7% 1%
90 BIASCO Anna 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 12% 1%
92 KUBIT Kayleigh A. 100% 85% 45% 12% 1% - -
93 LEE Allison (Allie) 100% 98% 87% 58% 24% 5% -
94 TANG Louise 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 13% 1%
95 NISHIMURA Madeleine A. 100% 100% 97% 87% 61% 29% 6%
96 JING Alexandra 100% 99% 94% 72% 37% 11% 1%
97 ROSS Megan N. 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 6% 1%
98 HOOSHI Erica S. 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3%
99 MCDONALD Alexandra 100% 91% 62% 26% 6% 1% -
100 LIAO Madeline M. 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 7% -
101 ABTIN Aryana V. 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
102 YEH Samantha 100% 97% 79% 43% 14% 2% -
103 CHOI Lenna K. 100% 99% 87% 42% 9% 1% -
104 JIA Amy 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 9% 1%
104 OUTHRED Maya E. 100% 92% 63% 25% 5% - -
106 GONG Christina S. 100% 99% 94% 73% 39% 11% 1%
107 NOGUCHI Julia C. 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 11% 1%
107 LEVI Lea 100% 99% 89% 63% 28% 7% 1%
107 ANDREYENKA Yana 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 4%
110 PARK Alexandra D. 100% 98% 87% 57% 23% 4% -
110 FLANAGAN Catherine H. 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 10% 1%
110 SHEN Jasmine N. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2% -
113 MOLLOY Aubrey G. 100% 71% 27% 5% - - -
114 NECHANICKY Mackensie J. 100% 93% 62% 24% 5% - -
115 GIANNESCHI Julia R. 100% 95% 75% 41% 14% 2% -
116 NAVALTA Cassandra (Cassie) R. 100% 68% 12% 1% - - -
116 KOKES Gabrielle 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 5% -
118 KOO Rachel A. 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 16% 2%
119 HARFELD Skylar 100% 99% 88% 56% 21% 3% -
120 PHAM Camille V. 100% 99% 88% 58% 21% 2% -
121 FEVRY Carlexa I. 100% 94% 55% 17% 3% - -
121 LESLIE Ryanne T. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 23% 2%
123 LUONG Tiffany C. 100% 90% 57% 20% 3% - -
124 SEAL Julie T. 100% 99% 88% 60% 26% 6% 1%
125 FERRETTI Anna Rebecca 100% 83% 41% 11% 1% - -
126 TURNER Stephanie E. 100% 58% 18% 3% - - -
127 LEE Madison 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% - -
128 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 100% 86% 47% 14% 2% - -
129 VEERKAMP Molly 100% 60% 20% 4% - -
130 BARNETTE Zoe 100% 96% 76% 41% 12% 1%
131 AHN Isabella 100% 75% 35% 9% 1% -
132 SHALANSKY Julia B. 100% 86% 48% 14% 2% -
133 ALFONSO Czarina M. 100% 92% 61% 25% 5% -
134 CHENG Lydia A. 100% 82% 44% 14% 3% - -
135 MAURER Bridgette (Brie) (Bridgette) C. 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 4% -
136 SARTORI Taylor M. 100% 90% 57% 21% 4% - -
137 CHON Samantha 100% 100% 99% 79% 39% 10% 1%
138 GOMES Rafaella T. 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% - -
139 YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 1% -
140 MUHAMMAD Auset 100% 93% 67% 31% 8% 1% -
141 GUO Kaitlyn S. 100% 64% 23% 5% - - -
141 WONG ERIKA G. 100% 43% 9% 1% - - -
143 SIMONTOV Sofia M. 100% 88% 48% 13% 2% - -
143 BHANOT Gayatri 100% 97% 79% 44% 15% 2% -
145 KIM Lauren Hyomin 100% 93% 66% 30% 7% 1% -
145 CHO Taylor S. 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
147 WALKER Mayah J. 100% 75% 33% 7% 1% - -
148 MATZ Samantha J. 100% 77% 34% 8% 1% - -
149 SUSINI Anna K. 100% 64% 21% 3% - - -
150 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 100% 96% 76% 38% 10% 1% -
151 WONG Allison M. 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% - -
151 CHEN Kelly 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% - -
151 TONG Ophelia 100% 87% 50% 15% 2% - -
154 MERGES Gretl C. 100% 85% 28% 3% - - -
155 CHO Eunice 100% 70% 30% 7% 1% - -
156 ABAYEVA Sasha 100% 96% 79% 49% 20% 5% -
157 GILIOLI Alexia 100% 92% 60% 23% 4% -
158 BANIN Alexandra G. 100% 92% 61% 23% 5% - -
159 BREKER Anika 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3%
160 ALTEN Ayaka 100% 75% 32% 7% 1% - -
161 HU Ally 100% 47% 6% - - - -
162 POWERS Meredith R. 100% 31% 2% - - - -
162 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa 100% 53% 12% 1% - - -
164 CHON Sydney 100% 66% 23% 4% - - -
165 MOON Elina C. 100% 91% 56% 17% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.