Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
2 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
3 | PANT Anisha | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
3 | SU Alena J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
5 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 20% |
6 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% | |
7 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | |
8 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
9 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% | |
10 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
11 | LEE Bethanie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
12 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
13 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | - |
14 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
15 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 4% | 24% | 52% | 20% | |
16 | NAIR Supriya | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
17 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
18 | WELBORN Calissa | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
19 | LEE Samantha X. | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
20 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 17% | |
21 | NICKOLOV Nora | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | - | |
22 | XU Audrey J. | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | HAN Crystal | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
24 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
25 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
26 | LUH Mia P. | 6% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
27 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 2% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
28 | FUNG Emma | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
29 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% |
30 | ZHENG Zoe | 2% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | HAN Ashley | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | PENG Charlotte | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
33 | TSANG Catherine | 1% | 14% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
34 | WANG Celine S. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
35 | MANN Sophia J. | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
36 | THOMAS Saejel | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
37 | ENRILE Erica | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | FUNG Vera | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | CONTOS Athena | 17% | 51% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
40 | SINGH Ashni | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | EBERHART Ava | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
42 | DAYAL Saahira | 10% | 42% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
43 | HO Kristen | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
46 | YANG Chloee | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.