Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SCARPA Ryan N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% |
2 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
3 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
3 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
5 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
6 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | |
7 | HODGES Carter F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
8 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
9 | OUELLETTE David M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 7% | |
10 | HU Oliver W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
11 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
12 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
13 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
14 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
15 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
16 | MEMANI Apurva | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
17 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 23% | |
18 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
19 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% | |
20 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
21 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 47% | 9% |
22 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | 100% | 97% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | |
23 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | |
24 | YU Vinni | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
25 | WU Albert | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
26 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
27 | MA Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
28 | SCHULTES Evans | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | REALS Alden D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 2% | |
30 | ANCONA Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
31 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
32 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
33 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
34 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 94% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
35 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
35 | SWADDIPONG Diego P. | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
37 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | RICCIO Frank J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
39 | BICKFORD Michael S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
40 | ST. CLAIR Regan A. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
41 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 86% | 40% | 7% | - | - | |
42 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
43 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
44 | HOWARD Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | 4% | |
45 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% | |
46 | BOVA Andrew | 100% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
47 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | 1% | |
48 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 97% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
49 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
50 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 92% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | |
51 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
52 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
53 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | |
54 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
55 | YU Dale | 100% | 61% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
56 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
57 | SHEIKH Arham | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
58 | PANDYA Poojan | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
60 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
61 | SCHKODA Jeremy | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.