Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
2 | SZEGO Levente (Levi) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
3 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
3 | JONES Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
5 | DAVIS Don | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
6 | LEE Stephen K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
7 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
8 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
9 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
10 | FELDMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
11 | ANDERSON Kristian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% | 2% |
12 | BALESTRACCI Chris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
12 | CHERNOMASHENTSEV Alan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
14 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 4% | |
15 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - |
16 | DIAZ Julio P. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
17 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
18 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
19 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
20 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | - |
21 | COTLAR Andrew D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
22 | GRISWOLD Doug | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
23 | MCINTOSH Michael | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
24 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
25 | AMRINE JR Terry L. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
26 | SCHWARTZMAN Benjamin | 100% | 79% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
27 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
28 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | - |
29 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
30 | HAN Jae | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
31 | CROSTHWAITE John T. | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
32 | GOODRICH Gary | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 2% | - |
33 | YOO Terry S. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
34 | HOOSHI Mark | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.