Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 3 | EXUM Monica M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 3 | TAYENGCO Michele T. | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 5 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
| 6 | COMES Rita | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 44% | 7% | |
| 7 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 8 | PIERCE Marcia M. | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 4% | |
| 9 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 50% | 25% | |
| 10 | NIEMEYER Jennifer A. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 11 | HUZEL Lisa | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 12 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 13 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 14 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
| 15 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | < 1% | 7% | 37% | 56% | |
| 16 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
| 17 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | GIFFORD Sally | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | WEISS Renee | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | MAUL Judy L. | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 22 | JANDURA Janet | 5% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | ROWLAND May | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | RIOS Donna B. | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 26 | TASKER Monisha B. | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SIMON Sally R. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | COOPER Tina M. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | POULIQUEN Karine S. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | GROCE Linda J. | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | ZEHE Michele A. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 34 | SMITH Kristina | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | KLINE julia | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | - |
| 36 | HERDMAN Samantha J. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | KELLY Diane A. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | CHAYKINA Natalie V. | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.