East Point, GA - East Point, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WEN Elaine Y. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
2 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
3 | FENG Kelly L. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
3 | CRISTIAN Ana | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
5 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | |
6 | THORNTON Paula R. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
7 | SPURLIN Alicen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
8 | SAUL Nicole | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
9 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 40% | 6% | |
10 | BARBER Annalise | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
11 | DILLARD Katlyn M. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
12 | PENSULA Sophia E. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
13 | KERAMANE Halah Z. | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
14 | PETITE Jenny | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
15 | BANKS Lauren M. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
16 | RIOS Donna B. | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
17 | HAMILTON Nina M. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
18 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
19 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
20 | ENDERLE Alexis N. | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
21 | ANDERSON Laura K. | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - | |
22 | PRICE Makalyn W. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
23 | LEE Calla | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | GELBER Sara | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | LIM Christina J. | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
26 | PRIOLEAU Isabel | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.