Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KALLUS DIANE H. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 2 | ESTRADA Anna G. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 3 | GRAHAM Bettie J. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 3 | CHANNING Gemin | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 5 | AHER Bonnie | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 6 | JULIEN Erica | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 7 | LUTTON Patricia | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
| 8 | HIGGINS Sally A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | LEIPER Carol | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 10 | HANAMOTO Claire M. | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 11 | BALESTRACCI SUZIE | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 12 | BRYNILDSEN Karen M. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | TURZILLO Mary A. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.