Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% |
| 2 | GANSER Yuliya | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 3 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | HUZEL Lisa | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
| 5 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 3% |
| 6 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 7 | HEINRICH Eva | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 9 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 10 | NIEMEYER Jennifer A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 11 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 12 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 14 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | NANTON SHYAMALA M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
| 16 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 18 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 19 | BRISK Angelica A. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 20 | SIMON Sally R. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | KUHN April | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | GALTO Meredith | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 23 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | MCMENAMIN Dianna S. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 26 | BOWIE Charlotta | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | TELLES Anna | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | CLAUSEN Amalie (Amy) | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 30 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 31 | ROWLAND May | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | CHANG Amanda Yen-Shih (Amanda) | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 33 | POULIQUEN Karine S. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 34 | RADICH Lori G. | - | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 35 | JACKSON Wilma S. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | TADLOCK Christine M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 37 | BELAOUSSOFF Vera | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | COOPER Tina M. | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 40 | WHEELER Michele L. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HOFMAN Haejung | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ZEHE Michele A. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | BROWN Trish M. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 46 | MANDEL Helen (Jenner) | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | MAUL Judy L. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | KLINE julia | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | RIOS Donna B. | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | TASKER Monisha B. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | STANICA Teodora O. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | KELLY Diane A. | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | GROCE Linda J. | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.