Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
2 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 17% | |
3 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
3 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
5 | SIVAGAR Fiona | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
6 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
7 | YAO Yilin | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
8 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% | |
9 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
10 | WANG Nora | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
11 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | - | |
12 | PECK Maia A. | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
13 | HSIU Elizabeth | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
14 | LEE Rachel | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
15 | BARNOW Sasha | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
16 | LEE Natasha | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 5% | |
17 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
18 | BARBARA Camille | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
19 | BUSH emma | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
20 | WOLTERBEEK Catherine | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | CHEN Clara | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
22 | LO Sabrina S. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
23 | HAU Olivia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
24 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | - | - | 5% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 5% |
25 | KIM Jayna | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
26 | FOREMAN Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 48% | 11% |
27 | ERDOGAN necla | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
28 | MAHAL Riya | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
29 | HUANG Lanlan | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
30 | YAN Grace | 9% | 38% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
31 | RODARTE Angelina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
32 | WANG Angelina | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
33 | MOHEBI Neeka | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
34 | BENNETT Vienne | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | TURIANO Nascharene | 6% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
36 | FENG Elaine | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
37 | GLUCKMAN Tori | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
38 | XU Katelyn | 55% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
39 | COSCI Angelina | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | LANGEVIN Sophie | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.