Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | GLUCK Myriam | 20% | 46% | 28% | 5% | - | |
2 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
3 | KIM Nam Heui | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
3 | FOLEY Eileen | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 32% | 6% |
5 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% |
6 | JERKINS Jayne A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
7 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
8 | ENOCHS Liz | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
9 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 15% |
10 | PERNICE Robin J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
11 | WILKERSON Mary B. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
12 | KING Robin E. | 2% | 20% | 56% | 21% | 2% | |
13 | VANCE Beth S. | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 8% | |
14 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
15 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
16 | YANG Jenny J. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
17 | THORNTON Eva | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
18 | DIEGEL Angela E. | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
19 | LAPP Laurie E. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
20 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
21 | SCHLIENGER Katia | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
22 | FELDMAN Jill A. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
23 | TAYLOR BLAKEMORE Kim | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
24 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | WALTER Joanne | 3% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - |
26 | WEBB Maud | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | MASTERS Lara A. | 42% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
28 | DEGEN Anita L. | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
29 | JOHNSON Pamela | 35% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.