Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FABRY Lydia L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 40% | 9% |
| 2 | EYRE Jane E. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 27% |
| 3 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% |
| 3 | TURNER Delia M. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| 5 | LORANG Kim L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 8% |
| 6 | DUNN Linda J. J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 7 | ALZONA Esperanza P. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 8 | OFFERLE Judith (Jude) A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 9 | LUM Karen | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 10 | DEROSE Miyako N. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | DEANE Dede | 19% | 44% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 12 | EL-SALEH S.S. Rachel | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 1% |
| 13 | RUNYAN Heidi | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 14 | BERARDI Gladys B. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | BALOT Agota | 6% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | GORDON Sharon | 2% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | HEARNE Rosa | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 20 | DAHL Naomi V. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | OLSON Lynne E | 14% | 47% | 32% | 7% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.